Make sure you like & follow our page so you can stay up-to-date with all of the farm happenings.
Wednesday, September 6, 2017
Tuesday, September 20, 2016
Parker's Report: Week 13
Week 13:
August 1-5, 2016
August 1-5, 2016
Monday was a pretty normal
day. I fed the horses and cleaned the barn before heading out to my bush hog. I
finished the back side of the North Pines that I didn’t get to finish last
week. Then I moved back over to the Long and began cutting on the other side of
the large, tree-lined ditch/creek that splits that pasture in half. Late in the
afternoon, as I outlined along the tree line I came across a large dead tree
branch hanging down in my path. I attempted to miss it but misjudged the
distance and ended up catching the branch on the cap to my radiator. It pulled
it up. Frustrated with myself I took the tractor back to shop and called Seth
to let him know what had happened. I had also lost one of the screens on the
side of the tractor but had found it because I had almost driven over it.
However, when I got back to the shop I realized that the other one had come off
as well. This was aggravating because I didn’t know how either screen had come
off, let alone where this one had. When I got to the barn Tuesday morning,
Willie, the gray gelding, limped up to the barn obviously lame. I cleaned his
hoofs out looking for rocks, checked all his joints for swelling, and felt for
heat- a sign of injury. I could find nothing wrong. I gave him a scoop of bute
with his feed. When I went to let him out of his stall to go to pasture he
wouldn’t leave. I called to him and tried to shoo him out but he just stood
there. I left the stall door open while I went to switch wires on the pasture
to give the horses new grass. I was hoping that Willie would come on out on his
own. When I got back up to the barn he was standing in the exact same place. I
gave him some hay and filled the water buckets with fresh water and left him in
the stall for the day. Then I went and got on the John Deere Gator and set out
to search for the missing tractor screen. This took almost all day. I drove up
and down every other row scanning for the screen. Finally, in the Long pasture
right beneath the dead tree branch that had caught on the radiator cap there
was screen in about 20 different pieces. I picked up every little scrap I could
find and took them back to the shop. Then I grabbed the 4555 to finish bush
hogging the Long. I was on autopilot and forgot to check the coolant. I got all
the way out to the pasture and it began to overheat. Dark clouds were building
overhead and it being so late in the afternoon that I went ahead and called it
a day. I checked Willie before I left. While he was more active than he had
been that morning he was still pretty lame, so I left him in the barn with
plenty of hay and water for the night. He was much better Wednesday morning so
I let him out to pasture with the rest of the horses. I drove down to the shop
to grab some coolant and Zack called me over to help him and Mr. Mike at the
grain bins. Some corn had piled up in one of the bins and wasn’t falling down
into the auger. Zack climbed in the bin to knock the corn down. I stood by the
man hole and communicated between him and Mr. Mike on when to turn the auger
on. Once the corn was knocked down and went to the tractor and put the coolant
in it before I continued cutting the Long pasture. On Thursday I moved to the
Motorcycle at the request of Seth. I left a little early to take the radiator
to West Point on my way home. Friday I finished the Motorcycle.
Picture Below:
Picture Below:
Parker's Report: Week 12
Week 12: Busywork
July 25-29, 2016
Monday morning started like any other. I got to the barn and began putting feed in each stall for the horses. My mind was on auto-pilot as I did so when I was startled by chirping coming from a bucket I had just filled with oats. I looked back and a fairly grown bird was flopping around in the bucket. I gently picked the young bird up and took him outside. He was obviously learning to fly and had fallen in the bucket. I placed him in a patch of grass where he wouldn’t be trampled on and a few moments later he took flight. Satisfied that he was ok I continued my morning routine. After caring for the horses I started up the tractor and went around to each pasture to finish cutting down the dead pigweed. Tuesday was an absolutely gorgeous day. I got to spend it in the open cab tractor spraying fence line. This time I focused mainly on the fences surrounding the hay fields. I also sprayed down all the pigweed that had grown up in and around the cattle pens. There were two steers and bull that watched me while I sprayed their pen down. The steers weren’t too keen on me coming into the pen. They ran around to the other side of the fence to watch. The bull however was curious. He came up to the fence and just watched as I opened and closed the gates and sprayed the pen down. The weather could not make its mind up on Wednesday. The sky was mostly lightly gray with much darker patches that would release a little rain. Patches of blue sky would peek through and occasionally the sun would make a brief appearance. I finished bush hogging the last few spots of pigweed I had’t been able to get to on Monday. With nothing else to do I was content to bush hog the North pines pasture that I was already in. The grass was thick and full of dallisgrass. I had fun cutting in straight lines parallel to the road to make the pasture look pretty. Ace accompanied me on the tractor for part of the morning. He looked so forlornly as I left out that morning that I couldn’t help but bring him along. He laid at my feet and helped me keep an eye out for potholes and other obstacles. As we passed next to the lake, a large fish that had been resting in the shallow water swam off in a rush. He made such a splash that it caught Ace’s attention. Ace didn’t know what to do or what it was. He looked at me with his ears perked up and head tilted to the side. I laughed and gave him a pet and continued on. On Thursday I moved across the fence and cut one side of the Long pasture. It was a huge ditch in the middle that is unpassable, so I only cut the side bordering the North Pines. The weather again couldn’t make up its mind whether it wanted to rain or be sunny. I just plodded along as best I could. Friday morning Ace greeted me with his fur full of burrs. He didn’t know it but he was going to get a bath just as soon as I finished with the horses. Once they were fed and put back out to pasture and the barn had been swept I put a halter on Ace and lead him out to the hose. I lathered him up with soap and brushed out what burrs I could. Then I repeated the process with plenty of conditioner. I got most of them out, but a good many remained tangled up in some of his longer hair. Once he was thoroughly rinsed off I ran some leave-in conditioner/ detangler through his fur and let him loose. Mrs. Dee then asked me to wash Seth’s truck for her so I did that. Once that was accomplished I went out to my tractor and did some more bush hogging before calling it a day.
Pictures below.
July 25-29, 2016
Monday morning started like any other. I got to the barn and began putting feed in each stall for the horses. My mind was on auto-pilot as I did so when I was startled by chirping coming from a bucket I had just filled with oats. I looked back and a fairly grown bird was flopping around in the bucket. I gently picked the young bird up and took him outside. He was obviously learning to fly and had fallen in the bucket. I placed him in a patch of grass where he wouldn’t be trampled on and a few moments later he took flight. Satisfied that he was ok I continued my morning routine. After caring for the horses I started up the tractor and went around to each pasture to finish cutting down the dead pigweed. Tuesday was an absolutely gorgeous day. I got to spend it in the open cab tractor spraying fence line. This time I focused mainly on the fences surrounding the hay fields. I also sprayed down all the pigweed that had grown up in and around the cattle pens. There were two steers and bull that watched me while I sprayed their pen down. The steers weren’t too keen on me coming into the pen. They ran around to the other side of the fence to watch. The bull however was curious. He came up to the fence and just watched as I opened and closed the gates and sprayed the pen down. The weather could not make its mind up on Wednesday. The sky was mostly lightly gray with much darker patches that would release a little rain. Patches of blue sky would peek through and occasionally the sun would make a brief appearance. I finished bush hogging the last few spots of pigweed I had’t been able to get to on Monday. With nothing else to do I was content to bush hog the North pines pasture that I was already in. The grass was thick and full of dallisgrass. I had fun cutting in straight lines parallel to the road to make the pasture look pretty. Ace accompanied me on the tractor for part of the morning. He looked so forlornly as I left out that morning that I couldn’t help but bring him along. He laid at my feet and helped me keep an eye out for potholes and other obstacles. As we passed next to the lake, a large fish that had been resting in the shallow water swam off in a rush. He made such a splash that it caught Ace’s attention. Ace didn’t know what to do or what it was. He looked at me with his ears perked up and head tilted to the side. I laughed and gave him a pet and continued on. On Thursday I moved across the fence and cut one side of the Long pasture. It was a huge ditch in the middle that is unpassable, so I only cut the side bordering the North Pines. The weather again couldn’t make up its mind whether it wanted to rain or be sunny. I just plodded along as best I could. Friday morning Ace greeted me with his fur full of burrs. He didn’t know it but he was going to get a bath just as soon as I finished with the horses. Once they were fed and put back out to pasture and the barn had been swept I put a halter on Ace and lead him out to the hose. I lathered him up with soap and brushed out what burrs I could. Then I repeated the process with plenty of conditioner. I got most of them out, but a good many remained tangled up in some of his longer hair. Once he was thoroughly rinsed off I ran some leave-in conditioner/ detangler through his fur and let him loose. Mrs. Dee then asked me to wash Seth’s truck for her so I did that. Once that was accomplished I went out to my tractor and did some more bush hogging before calling it a day.
Pictures below.
Tuesday, July 19, 2016
Parker's Report: Week 10
Week 10:
Trimming and Tractors
July 11-15, 2016
July 11-15, 2016
Pictures Below
The Importance of Accounting for Precipitation When Using Soil Moisture Probe Based Irrigation Scheduling In the Sub-Tropical Climate of the Southeastern United States by Parker Grace Adams
The Importance of Accounting for Precipitation When Using Soil Moisture Probe Based
Irrigation Scheduling In the Sub-Tropical Climate of the Southeastern United States
Parker Grace Adams
Abstract
This paper discusses the importance of irrigation scheduling and the various methods
available to determine when irrigation should occur. Irrigation scheduling is an extremely
beneficial technology introduced to the agricultural industry in the past several decades that has
allowed the cultivation of land not in close proximity to water as well as improved the crop
yields of that cultivated land. But unrestricted irrigation can lead to a soil excessively saturated
with water, ultimately reducing crop yields. Therefore, in the interest of producing maximum
crop yields as well as reducing the money, water, and energy inputs used in irrigation, it is
prudent to schedule irrigation times to receive maximum benefits. Soil moisture probes are often
used to determine how much water to apply based on the amount of moisture available in the
ground. When that moisture reading is lower than a specified point irrigation systems can be
turned on. In arid and semi-arid climate regions were rainfall is scarce a schedule of irrigation
can be created from soil moisture probes. However, in the sub-tropical climate of the
Southeastern United States putting together an irrigation schedule based solely on soil moisture
probes is a bit more complicated due to the noteworthy amount of rainfall received during the
growing season. This rainfall must be taken into account when irrigating so as not to over-water
the crops. A simple check-and- balance system can be used to determine the proper amount of
water application and derive an irrigation schedule. In this paper, the importance of using both
weather data and soil moisture probe data to derive an irrigation schedule for crops grown in the
sub-tropical climate of the Southeastern United States will be explored and expounded upon in
addition to the other factors which contribute to efficient irrigation scheduling.
Keywords: irrigation scheduling, soil moisture probes, rainfall, weather data, balancing method,
sub-tropical climate
Introduction
Irrigation has been an invaluable resource to farmers for many ages. Irrigation practices
have continually been improved upon enhancing benefits as well. Crop yields have increased
under the practice of irrigation and have done so further under precisely scheduled irrigation
events. Related factors of production such as input costs of water and energy use are reduced.
Nutrient, fertilizer, and pesticide losses are lowered as well. While irrigation and irrigation
scheduling have many benefits, there are a few concerns that must be taken into account.
Irrigation occurs in conjunction with precipitation and as such over-watering can easily transpire.
Over-watering results in decreased crop yields and increased input costs. Using soil-moisture
probes, irrigation can be precisely scheduled to avoid over- or under-watering crops. However, in
the subtropical climate of the southeastern United States, annual rainfall is high and soil moisture
probes cannot detect or predict coming storms. Therefore, it is important to weather data with a
soil moisture probe based irrigation scheduling system in the Southeast.
Irrigation
Water is arguably the most important and greatest limiting factor in plant growth and
crop yield. Without water the plant will not grow. Plants receive their needed supply of water
through precipitation events like rainfall or other natural sources such as ground water. In
production settings, irrigation is used to supplement precipitation. Sometimes this is because
precipitation events alone do not provide the plant with its needed amount of water. In most
cases irrigation supplements rainfall because it increases crop yields (Knappenberger 5).
Increased crop yield can result in an increase in profit or a decrease in inputs such as the amount
of land required to produce the same amount of crop. Therefore, irrigation is considered a
beneficial and often necessary farming practice.
Hazards of Over-Watering
Irrigation can easily result in an overwatering of crops. Overwatered crops have a lower
crop yield. This occurs due to the over-saturated moisture content of the soil. An over water-
saturated soil often leads to “plant disease, nutrient leaching, and reduced pesticide
effectiveness” (Evans 1996).
Furthermore, over-irrigating crops leads to other unfavorable effects. Over-irrigation
wastes water, a declining, valuable resource (Evans 1996). Water for irrigation is pulled from
ground water reserves. This can be a water body such as a lake, a reservoir, or an aquifer
(Kebede 2918). Many producers in the delta region of Mississippi use the Mississippi River
Alluvial Aquifer to irrigate their crops, but the Aquifer is not being replenished to meet the
demands of producers (Kebede 2918). With proper techniques, water can be applied in an
efficient method. One of the most important methods of efficient irrigation is the timing of water
(Evans 1996). The timing of water application to crops has been shown to not only increase crop
yields but decrease the water required as well (Harrison 2005). Prudent scheduling of irrigation
times can also minimize wasted water in the form of runoff and percolation losses (Evans 1996).
Minimizing these losses assists in sustaining irrigation water reserves. Scheduling irrigation
leads to an efficient use of water as a resource.
Another negative effect of over-irrigation is wasted energy use. Energy use is related to
irrigation and can be translated into a dollar amount. Irrigation systems require energy in the
form of electricity to run including pumping water from a reserve to the field. If over-irrigation
occurs, not only is water being wasted which decreases crop yields, but energy is being wasted in
running the system that is over-irrigating the crops. It is a double loss.
Energy can be saved by “no longer pumping water that is [being] wasted” (Evans 1996).
Mentioned previously, the amount of water needed can be reduced by applying it at opportune
times. By not using as much water, irrigation systems are not running as long and therefore, the
energy required to run the system is reduced. Decreasing both the energy and water required for
irrigation decreases input costs. Decreased input costs translate into an increase in profit (Evans
1996). That increase in profit is further maximized by the increase in crop yield stemming from
the efficient irrigation practices.
Using Soil Moisture Probes to Schedule Irrigation
The purpose of irrigation scheduling is to “determine the timing and the amount of water
to be applied based upon the crop’s water needs, soil water storage capacity, and climate
conditions” (Kebede 2922). Soil moisture probes are often used to schedule irrigation (Kebede
2923). They are based upon the moisture content in the soil. Plants experience stress when water
levels in the soil dip below a certain amount (Martin 2009). A stress level threshold is often set
for crops at a matric potential of 50kPa, below which “plants are considered to be under stress”
and which is why “[it] is considered as an irrigation trigger” (Knappenberger 5). Soil moisture
probes can be used to detect the matric potential of the soil in effect measuring the moisture
available in the soil to the plants. This information can be used to determine when to begin
irrigation and how much water to apply (Kebede 2922).
Soil water storage capacity plays a role in scheduling irrigation due to the differences in
the ability of different soils to hold water (Harrison 2005). For example, sandy soils hold less
water than clay soils. Therefore a crop grown in a sandy soil will need to be irrigated more
frequently than a crop grown in a clay soil (Harrison 2005). This volume ultimately dictates
irrigation, as it determines how much water can be made available to crops as stored in the soil
(Evans 1996). Once the soil water storage capacity is reached, excess water becomes runoff and
percolation (Evans 1996). Again, this harkens back to wasted energy and water that translates
into increased input costs. Furthermore, runoff and percolation reduce pesticide effectiveness and
are a cause of nutrient leaching (Harrison 2005). The water storage capacity of a soil plays a part
in overwatering as well. Excess soil moisture results in plant disease and decreased crop yields as
stated previously (Harrison 2005).
Associated to the amount of water available in the soil, moisture probes account for the
amount of water used by the plant (Kebede 2922). This crop water use is defined as “the amount
of water given up to the atmosphere by transpiration through plant leaves and evaporation from
the soil and plant surfaces” (Kebede2922). These two processes, evaporation and transpiration,
are combined in the term evapotranspiration (Kebede2922). Daily crop water use changes
throughout the growing season depending on different factors such as the life stage of the crop,
temperature, and wind-speed (Kebede 2922).
In arid and semi-arid regions such as the western United States, soil moisture probes
work very well in conjunction with irrigation systems. Once the probes detect that the soil
moisture is below a set threshold amount they trigger the irrigation system to begin irrigating
(Martin 2009). The threshold value is usually set above the stress-inducing matric potential value
so as to “insure that water stress will not be so severe as to cause any appreciable yield losses”
(Martin 2009). Thus, the whole system can be automated. This is in part due to the minimal
amount of annual rainfall that occurs in arid/ semi-arid regions and the even smaller amount
which occurs during the growing season (NCSU 2012). Because the annual rainfall is minimal,
overwatering is not a concern. In effect, with precipitation not a concern irrigation scheduling
operates in a controlled environment where efficiency is increased.
A soil moisture probe based irrigation system can work in sub-tropical areas such as the
southeastern United States. Jason Krudtz, a Mississippi State University irrigation specialist at
the Delta Research and Extension Center in Stoneville, Mississippi, is a huge proponent of soil
moisture sensors. In an article on the use of the sensors in Mississippi Krudtz explained their
efficiency. “‘It sounds absurd to say that you can apply half the water you normally apply and we
can maintain or improve your yield almost guaranteed and improve your profitability by cutting
way down on your water cost,’” Krutz said at the 2013 MSU Row Crops Short Course (Coblentz
2013).
Accounting for Precipitation
The main downfall of using soil moisture probes to schedule irrigation is they cannot
detect coming precipitation events. Annual rainfall must be considered when scheduling
irrigation. The southeast — including Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi,
North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee — receives an annual rainfall amount of between
40 and 70 inches (NCSU 2012). While annual rainfall is high only 30% occurs during growing
season (Kebede 2918). Therefore, irrigation is used to supplement precipitation and maximize
crop yield. If irrigation were to occur without consideration for precipitation overwatering would
transpire leading to reduced crop yield and decreased efficiency. Therefore, combining a
moisture probe based system with a weather based system is wise.
Combining Scheduling Methods
In its simplest form, irrigation scheduling occurs in what is commonly referred to as the
checkbook method. The checkbook method is a simple accounting approach that seeks to
balance the crops’ water needs with incoming water sources based on water levels in the root
zone (Evans 1996). Water inputs such as irrigation and precipitation are compared against water
outputs such as crop water use, evapotranspiration, and percolation losses (Harrison 2005).
Building upon the checkbook method, other factors may be included. Annual rainfall that
occurs during the growing season in the southeast should be taken into account. The timing of
rainfall is most important as it has a major impact on irrigation decisions (Evans 1996). Irrigation
can be automatically scheduled to occur at certain times, however, these times do not account for
precipitation occurrences. Chances are that irrigation and precipitation will overlap causing over-
watering to occur reducing overall efficiency and crop yield (Evans 1996). In some instances, it
might be more wise to postpone irrigation in anticipation of a precipitation event than irrigate.
Final judgement is left to the producer.
More complex methods and models include factors such as wind speed, temperature,
solar radiation, past weather data, evaporation estimates, crop water use and more (Kebede
2924). One such model is the Mississippi Irrigation Scheduling Tool or MIST (Kebede 2924).
Many more programs exist, most are programmable and calibrated to local areas.
Conclusion
Irrigation scheduling requires knowledge of soil types, soil moisture capacity, crops, crop
stress, the potential yield of a crop if it remains stressed, and system operation. Scheduling is
often used by producers to maximize their crop yields while simultaneously reducing their input
costs. Other benefits occur such as minimized runoff that prevents nutrient, fertilizer, and
pesticide losses. Irrigation scheduling often utilizes soil moisture probes to determine when
irrigation should occur based on the amount of moisture in the soil. In the sub-tropical region of
the southeastern United States weather events play a role in scheduling irrigation. Annual rainfall
is high enough in the growing season to risk over-watering when irrigation also takes place.
Therefore, it is wise and advantageous to use soil moisture probe based irrigation and weather
data when scheduling irrigation events.
References
Coblentz, Bonnie, 2013 “Moisture sensors are key part of efficient irrigation” Mississippi State
University Extension, Mississippi Agricultural News, Accessible at: http://msucares.com/
news/print/agnews/an13/20131217_irrigation.html, Accessed March 25, 2016
Evans, Robert; Sneed, R.E.; Cassel, D.K.; 1996, “Irrigation Scheduling to Improve Water and
Energy Use Efficiency”, North Carolina Coorperative Extension Service, AG 452-4,
Accessible at: https://www.bae.ncsu.edu/programs/extension/evans/ag452-4.html,
Accessed March 25, 2016
Harrison, Kerry, 2005, “Irrigation Scheduling Methods”, University of Georgia Extension, B
974, Accessible at: http://extension.uga.edu/publications/detail.cfm?number=B974,
Accessed March 25, 2016
Kebede, H., Fisher, D.K., Sui, R. and Reddy, K.N. (2014) “Irrigation Scheduling in the Delta
Region of Mississippi: Current Status and Strategies to Improve Irrigation Efficiency”,
American Journal of Plant Sciences, Vol.05 No20(2014), Article ID: 50005, pages 2917
-2928, Accessible at: http://file.scirp.org/Html/2-2601651_50005.htm, Accessed March
25, 2016
Knappenberger, Thorsten; Ortiz, Brenda; Delaney, Dennis; 2015 “Improvement of Irrigation
Management on Alabama Black Belt Soils”, Auburn University, pages 1-6
Martin, Edward C., 2009, “Methods of Measuring for Irrigation Scheduling—When”, The
University of Arizona, Arizona Cooperative Extension Arizona Water Series No.3, pages
1-7, Accessible at: http://extension.arizona.edu/sites/extension.arizona.edu/files/pubs/az1
220.pdf, Accessed March 26, 2016
North Carolina State University, 2012, “Southeast Precipitation”, Climate Education for K-12,
Accessible at: https://climate.ncsu.edu/edu/k12/.SEPrecip, Accessed March 28 2016
Parker's Report: Week 8
Week 8:
Publicity and Pigweed
June 27-31, 2016
June 27-31, 2016
Happy July 4th!
Pictures below.
Storm
rolling in
Momma cow
and her calf cuddling
Mrs. Dee
moving the Quad cows
Mr. Matt
crop dusting
Filming
for the United Soybean Board
Paradise
Spraying
the spiny amaranth
Horses
grazing on some fresh grass
Ace wanting
to be petted as usual
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)